top of page
IMG_5071.heic
IMG_5072.heic

Connections and Iterations 

IMG_5074.heic
IMG_5073.heic

Base Model 

process.png
IMG_5079.heic
IMG_5079.heic
IMG_5080.heic
IMG_5081.heic
IMG_5082.heic

Building Participant 1

IMG_5075.heic

Building Participant 2

IMG_5076.heic
IMG_5077.heic
IMG_5078.heic
IMG_0822.HEIC

Building Participant 3

IMG_0823.HEIC
IMG_0824.HEIC
IMG_0825.HEIC

Quiddity through a human variation 

Asking Random participants to build a building from scratch 

IMG_0832.HEIC
IMG_0833.HEIC
IMG_0838.HEIC
IMG_0831.HEIC
IMG_0830.HEIC

Their unpredictable input adds haecceity, but the quiddity remains the base logic shaping the experience.

Similarities in the design process

All builders engage creatively, whether they are trained architects or everyday participants. Each person uses some form of intuition, pattern recognition, or visual judgment when placing LEGO bricks. Despite differences in experience, everyone is shaped by the same material limits—brick size, color, and how pieces connect. No matter their skill level, most aim to build something that feels balanced, expressive, or “right” in their own way. This shared creative instinct highlights a common thread across all contributions in the project.

Iterations:

IMG_0827.heic
IMG_0826.heic

Final Model

In my final model, I was inspired to move toward a more abstract form, breaking away from purely structured design. The decision to include a concrete-like base came from my earlier base model, which grounded the sculpture and gave it weight and stability. This foundation acted as a visual anchor, allowing the rest of the form to evolve more freely above it. The abstract upper sections were directly inspired by the diverse styles and instincts of all the participants who contributed. Their input pushed me to embrace unpredictability and explore how expressive, irregular building could coexist with a solid, intentional base.

bottom of page